What Makes a Watch Truly ‘In-House’? The Truth About Watch Movements

"In-house movement"—it’s one of the most overused and misunderstood terms in the watch world. Watch brands love to market their in-house calibers as a sign of exclusivity and superior craftsmanship, but what does it actually mean?

Is an in-house movement always better, or is it just another marketing gimmick? Let’s break down the truth behind in-house vs. outsourced watch movements and what really matters when choosing a timepiece.

What Does “In-House Movement” Actually Mean?

An in-house movement is a watch caliber that is designed, manufactured, and assembled entirely by the brand that sells the watch. This means the brand has full control over its production, from engineering to finishing. Are they really worth the money?

In theory, an in-house movement should:

✔ Offer better quality control
✔ Have unique engineering and innovation
✔ Be exclusive to that brand

However, not all "in-house movements" are truly in-house—and that’s where things get murky.

(P.S. Why should you care?)

In-House vs. Outsourced Movements: What’s the Difference?

Watch brands fall into three main categories when it comes to movements:

1️⃣ True In-House Movements (Fully Manufactured by the Brand)

These brands design, manufacture, and assemble their movements from scratch. The movement is exclusive to their watches and not sold to other companies.

🔹 Examples of True In-House Brands:
✔ Rolex – Caliber 3235 in the Datejust, 4130 in the Daytona
✔ Patek Philippe – Caliber 324 SC in the Nautilus 5711
✔ Audemars Piguet – Caliber 4401 in the Royal Oak Chronograph

💡 The Truth: True in-house movements are rare because they require massive investment in R&D, machinery, and skilled labor.

2️⃣ Modified or “In-House” But Not Really (Reworked Base Movements)

Some brands take a movement from another manufacturer (like ETA or Sellita), modify it, and rebrand it as their own.

🔹 Examples of Modified Movements:
✔ Tudor MT5652 – A modified Kenissi movement
✔ TAG Heuer Caliber 02 – Based on Seiko’s 6S37 chronograph movement
✔ Panerai P.9000 Series – Modified from ValFleurier movements

💡 The Truth: Many brands call these “in-house” movements, but they are actually heavily modified third-party calibers. This isn’t necessarily bad—some of these movements are exceptional—but they aren’t fully in-house.

(Check out this article for more details)

3️⃣ Third-Party (Outsourced) Movements

Some brands completely outsource their movements from ETA, Sellita, Seiko, or Miyota without major modifications.

🔹 Examples of Outsourced Movements:
✔ Breitling Superocean (Pre-2017) – Used ETA 2824-2
✔ Longines HydroConquest – Uses ETA-based L888 movement
✔ TAG Heuer Carrera Calibre 5 – Based on Sellita SW200-1

💡 The Truth: Third-party movements can still be excellent—brands like ETA and Sellita have decades of proven reliability. Some brands even regulate third-party movements to achieve better accuracy than standard in-house calibers.

Are In-House Movements Always Better?

Not necessarily. Here’s how in-house and third-party movements compare in key areas:

💡 Key Takeaway: In-house movements are great for prestige and innovation, but third-party movements can be more practical and easier to maintain.

The Best In-House and Third-Party Movements

Top In-House Movements to Watch For

🔹 Rolex Caliber 3235 – Used in the Datejust, Submariner; features 70-hour power reserve and Chronergy escapement.
🔹 Patek Philippe Caliber 240 – Ultra-thin automatic movement with micro-rotor.
🔹 Omega Co-Axial 3861 – The latest Moonwatch movement, METAS-certified for extreme accuracy.

Best Third-Party Movements That Perform Exceptionally Well

🔹 ETA 2824-2 – Found in Tudor, Longines, and Hamilton—workhorse reliability.
🔹 Sellita SW200-1 – Used in TAG Heuer, Oris, and IWC; nearly identical to ETA 2824-2.
🔹 Miyota 9015 – High-quality Japanese movement found in microbrands.

The Future of In-House Movements

More brands are moving toward in-house movements, but not every in-house caliber is revolutionary. Some brands use “in-house” for marketing rather than true innovation.

📌 Rolex and Omega continue to push movement technology with antimagnetic materials and extended power reserves.
📌 Independent brands like Grand Seiko and H. Moser & Cie are making in-house movements more accessible.
📌 Microbrands are starting to modify third-party movements to create semi-in-house calibers.

The Bottom Line: Should You Care About In-House Movements?

If you love the idea of owning something unique, expertly crafted, and exclusive, then an in-house movement might be worth it.

If you prefer practicality, affordability, and ease of service, a high-quality third-party movement will serve you just as well.

In the end, the best movement is the one that keeps ticking on your wrist—and makes you excited to wear it.

💬 What’s Your Take on In-House Movements?

Do you prefer a fully in-house caliber, or do you think third-party movements are just as good? Drop a comment and let’s discuss!

🔥 For more watch insights, subscribe to Own The Watch!