- Own The Watch
- Posts
- The Myth of Luxury: Why Expensive Watches Don’t Always Mean Better
The Myth of Luxury: Why Expensive Watches Don’t Always Mean Better
High price tags don’t always equal better quality. Here’s why mid-tier watches might be the smarter choice.
Luxury watches are often seen as the pinnacle of craftsmanship, status, and exclusivity. Brands like Rolex, Patek Philippe, and Audemars Piguet dominate conversations about quality timepieces.
But here’s the truth: A higher price tag doesn’t always mean a better watch.
Watch marketing has convinced people that luxury equals superior quality, but in reality, you’re often paying for hype, branding, and artificial scarcity. Let’s break down the myth of luxury watches and why spending less might actually get you a better timepiece.
💰 What Are You Really Paying for in a Luxury Watch?

Luxury watch brands justify their high prices with heritage, craftsmanship, and exclusivity. But if you break down the cost, you’ll see where your money actually goes:
🔹 Brand Prestige – A Rolex doesn’t cost thousands because of the materials; it costs that much because it’s a Rolex.
🔹 Marketing & Sponsorships – Many luxury brands spend more on advertising than on actual watchmaking.
🔹 Artificial Scarcity – Limited production runs make certain watches "rare," even if the demand is inflated.
🔹 Dealer Markups – Buying at retail is almost impossible, leading to inflated secondary market prices.
None of these things improve the watch itself. You’re paying for a story, not necessarily superior mechanics.
🛠 When Expensive Watches Aren’t Built Better
Luxury watches often use movements and materials that aren’t significantly better than those in mid-range watches.
For example:
✅ The Tudor Black Bay (around $4,000) has a movement nearly identical to some Rolex models—without the 5-figure price tag.
✅ The Omega Speedmaster (around $6,500) still uses a Hesalite crystal, which scratches easily—while a $500 Seiko Prospex dive watch has sapphire crystal.
✅ Many luxury brands use the same ETA or Sellita movements found in watches that cost a fraction of the price.
You’re not always paying for better technology—you’re paying for the brand name attached to it.
📈 The Resale & Investment Myth
Many people justify buying luxury watches by claiming they hold or increase in value. And while that’s true for some models, it’s not the rule.
Here’s the reality:
🔹 Only a handful of watches appreciate. Rolex Daytonas, Patek Nautiluses, and AP Royal Oaks rise in value—but most luxury watches depreciate the second you wear them.
🔹 The market is volatile. Watch investment influencers will hype up the market—but try selling a luxury watch during an economic downturn.
🔹 Condition matters. Scratches, missing papers, or worn straps can drastically impact resale value.
If you’re buying a luxury watch as an "investment," you’re gambling—just like in stocks or crypto.
🔍 Are There Watches That Are a Better Value?
Absolutely. Some brands offer better craftsmanship, reliability, and performance without the absurd price tag.
Here’s what to look for:
✅ In-House Movements: Brands like Grand Seiko, Nomos, and Longines produce excellent in-house movements at a fraction of the price of Swiss luxury brands.
✅ Better Materials: Mid-tier watches often use ceramic bezels, sapphire crystals, and titanium cases—features found in luxury watches but at much lower costs.
✅ Independent Brands: Microbrands like Ming, Halios, and Baltic are producing watches with incredible attention to detail, often outshining mass-produced luxury models.
Instead of chasing status-symbol brands, focus on quality and craftsmanship that actually justify the price.
🎭 Luxury Watches vs. Real-World Performance
Luxury watches are marketed as the ultimate tool watches, but let’s be honest—no one is actually diving to 300m in a Rolex Submariner.
🔹 Pilots wear Garmin or Casio, not Patek Philippe.
🔹 Military operators wear G-Shocks, not Audemars Piguet.
🔹 Scientists in extreme conditions use Seikos and Citizens, not Richard Mille.
The watches that actually get put to the test are often the ones under $1,000—because they’re built to be worn, not just admired.
If function matters more than flexing, you don’t need a luxury watch.
⌚ Should You Ever Buy a Luxury Watch?
Yes—if you truly love it.
A luxury watch shouldn’t be about hype, investment potential, or impressing others. It should be about:
✔️ Appreciating craftsmanship and history.
✔️ Wearing something that brings personal satisfaction.
✔️ Choosing a watch because you love it—not because of resale value.
If a luxury watch genuinely speaks to you, buy it for the right reasons. Not because someone on Instagram says it’ll be worth more later.
⏳ The Bottom Line: Luxury ≠ Better
Luxury watches don’t automatically mean superior quality, value, or function.
📌 Don’t be fooled by branding and artificial scarcity.
📌 Mid-tier watches often offer better features for the price.
📌 Buy watches for yourself—not for hype or resale.
At the end of the day, a watch should be worn and enjoyed, not treated as a stock portfolio.
If you’re spending thousands on a watch, make sure it’s because you truly love it—not because someone told you to.
💬 What’s Your Take?
Do you think luxury watches are worth it, or is the hype overrated? Drop a comment—I’d love to hear your thoughts.
🔥 Want more no-BS watch insights? Subscribe to Own The Watch!
Do you think luxury watches are overrated? |
Reply